Find an event

Live review | Other Dance Festival 2011: Week 3

Posted in Unscripted blog by Zachary Whittenburg on Sep 23, 2011 at 11:21pm

Philip Elson pelts it out in the Seldoms’ Stupormarket.

Photo: William Frederking

Week three of the Other Dance Festival opens with a tweaked excerpt from an excellent work that premiered here in February, the SeldomsStupormarket. We enter the piece at the beginning of a middle section during which seven dancers demonstrate humorously titled moves (“The Slappy Swayback,” “The Sleepy Hunchback”) and name their prices. This gives way to a stretch of big, exciting movement including part of Thrift, choreographer Carrie Hanson’s 2009 women’s duet that, along with another short, Death of a (Prada) Salesman, gave birth to this evening-length work scored by Richard Woodbury.

The group’s architectural bobbing and weaving dies down; Javier Marchán Ramos kneels low and marks a volume with his forearms about one cubic foot and shaped like a house. Philip Elson—now living in Portland, sorely missed here onstage—steps in to receive this invisible house and marks it again, a little larger, and a little bit off of the ground. Amanda McAlister, Cara Sabin, Christina Gonzalez-Gillett and Damon Green each continue the sequence; by the time Green passes the “house” to Paige Cunningham, it’s big enough to step into. In order to redraw it larger, Cunningham’s body leaps wildly, pushed to its limits. Whirring saws and banging hammers soundtrack this inflation of a home that’s not actually there, seen only through physical labor. Cheekily, Hanson closes the segment with a bit involving bubblegum.

Seldom is it that dance-theater sparked by recent history speaks so firmly and so poetically to us about it.

Second work You may think I don’t know you, a seemingly structured improvisation, takes the evening in a wholly different direction. Next to an operable, freestanding door and frame made out of plastic tubing and roughed up (by Nick Grutz), superb Chicago clarinetist James Falzone plays to three women’s tumbling, articulate diagonal progression. Once Rachel Damon, Adriana Durant and JulieAnn Graham reach the door—comically revealing how creaky and flimsy it is—Falzone shifts into a quicker, jazzier idiom. A third zone finds the women, who wear simple print dresses, delving deeper into relationships and creating tension around the door. Falzone responds with more urgent, wailing sounds from his clarinet, reminiscent of Robert Mirabal’s vocals during Eiko & Koma’s Raven (occurring at almost exactly the same time, five miles southeast at the MCA Stage). It’s the most satisfying and cohesive improvisation I’ve seen since a festival for the form around town last June.

The Power of Cheer, a quintet led by Mattrick Swayze (née Matthew Hollis), closes the first half with a joke-packed pom routine, half a capella and half to Kid Sister. It’s very well-rehearsed, freaking hilarious, and gently roasts festival cofounder Kay LaSota.

While the excerpt from the HumansPaper Shoes that follows is crisper and more focused than it was last December, it’s still a hard piece to invest in as a viewer. Part of the problem is that, when choreographer Rachel Bunting performs her own movement, it seethes with purpose; in particular, her eyes glow and quiver as if she’s seeing fantastic or horrifying things. Her collaborators too often seem to be following odd instructions they can’t figure out how to get into and own. (“Walk slowly toward the audience with a chair balanced on your head. A tick-tocking metronome will be attached to the chair.”) Sketchily conceived and poorly directed, it becomes tedious when it could be transportingly bizarre.

So the expansive, pure-movement study that follows, called locationships, come and gone, is a welcome palate-cleanser. Cochoreographed by Christine Betsill and Johannah Wininsky of Thread Meddle Outfit, it’s for seven women to smart music by Menomena, Swans and Tortoise. Hope Goldman, Becky O’Connell and Anna Sapozhnikov are especially fluent in their roles and deliberate in their choices. But in the end, it’s Naharin Lite, to Ohad’s work what Editors were to Interpol. Even the costumes recall Three.

The stage crew ties the wings back to the walls, opening the room wide for the closer, by Colleen Halloran with its performers, Paige Cunningham and Dardi McGinley Gallivan. A layered work for strings by Julia Kent—one of her loop-pedal cello pieces, from the sounds of it—drives Power (in the streets), as tight and as short as one of Snooki’s favorite dresses. The two women barely make physical contact, but they’re constantly connected and minutely aware of each another. (McGinley Gallivan’s hand, outstretched, follows one of Cunningham’s passes for only just a second but the gesture is laser-guided.) The duet has the rhythms of a boxing match: Tense bursts of rapid-fire cause and effect which alternate with longer periods of strategizing, rest and wound-licking. The two dancers convey the intimacy of sisters; their bows are greeted with well-deserved hollers from a full house.


The tenth annual Other Dance Festival continues with a fourth and final program at the Hamlin Park Fieldhouse September 29 and 30.

Previous post
Next post
09/23/2011
Share with your network
Comment
Comments
The real question is whether you have an imagination or not. Literally every person that approached me after this piece said things like "spellbinding, riveting, disturbing, clear, imagic....etc..." To say something is "poorly directed" when you can see everything on stage and what you see inspires actual thought and imagination is just wrong. To say it is "sketchily conceived" implies that I have just thrown something together willy nilly, when it actually has an idea and is using the stuff of art: metaphor, image, symbol, etc...is also wrong. Perhaps I am using them in a new way that feels weird or surreal or not of the common trend in dance. Aren't artists supposed to keep chipping away at their own boundaries? Aren't they obligated to keep pushing the form forward and not stagnate in the same soup forever and ever? I'm ashamed that Chicago dance critics can't celebrate someone-in town-that is pushing the envelope. And, to say one of my performers can't "get behind" what they are doing is ridiculous. Physically, it took every bit of their concentration to balance the chair on their heads...they were most definitely "in it"," and beyond that, it is a complete image in itself. One doesn't have to sell that. It is a symbol. It just is. This piece is "transportingly bizarre." Thank you for those words. But, where did you come up with those words if they didn't pop in your head while watching the piece or contemplating it after the fact? And, if you really think it wasn't "transportingly bizarre," but could have been, are there any constructive thoughts you might have shared? I'm not trying to make friends around here either. I'm trying to make art.
By rachel bunting (not verified) on 9/27/2011 at 7:45 am
Why are Rachel Bunting's comments on her own dance and philosophy more interesting and better written than the critic Zachary Whittenburg's critique of her dance? Is it because she could do his job(write about dance), and he couldn't do hers(create art)? What is a Zachary Whittenburg? A status quo symptom? A static-making machine part - I can feel the prickly breeze of his limited vision in every sentence. Though I've never met her, I have had the privelege of watching Rachel Bunting's work a few times(including this piece), and it is something even more striking than her eyes. Perhaps part of the problem is Zachary Whittenburg can't stop looking at her eyes. Perhaps his thinking has been stilled, or frightened, and he only wishes for the metronome-like, cause-and-effect ticking of a typical modern dance piece to smooth out the bumps where he might actually be forced to use his imagination. Oh Zachary Whittenburg, how many of you are there? Do you go on forever?
By julie paradise (not verified) on 11/18/2011 at 5:55 pm
privilege.
By julie paradise (not verified) on 11/18/2011 at 7:07 pm
I am the real Julie Paradise and I did not write either of the two comments attributed to me. I'm not sure this was accidental, as I study dance and attend many dance concerts. But I did not attend the concert in question and these comments do not reflect my opinion of it.
By Anonymous (not verified) on 12/16/2011 at 9:48 am
Have an Opinion? Let's hear it