Find today's showtimes
Find a restaurant
Connect to share what you're reading and see friend activity. (?)

Insidious | Film review

Saw hack James Wan takes a few more slices from old movies.

By Ben Kenigsberg
Published: March 30, 2011
SEANCE YOU BEEN GONE Byrne and Wilson realize they're in an old-fashioned horror movie.

At the world premiere of Insidious in Toronto last September, Saw director Wan introduced his movie as “this generation’s Poltergeist.” Premature, maybe, considering no audience on Earth had seen it, but that sort of enthusiasm is endearing, even in Ed Wood types. It’s a lineage Wan does proud: The film is a forehead-slapping barrage of reflex-testing shock cuts, poorly motivated camera setups, loud noises and rather too many things that go boo. Melding Poltergeist and The Exorcist to the digital-era home-haunting of Paranormal Activity (the latter’s director, Oren Peli, gets a producing credit), Wan has the source material down cold. But while his film can scarcely claim an original shot, its ambition to scare people simply through story and camerawork speaks to a refreshing ingenuousness: This is creaky, old-fashioned hack horror, for better and worse.

Perfect couple Byrne and Wilson awake to find one of their children (Simpkins) in what seems to be a coma, but the doctors can’t figure it out. At the same time, their home is invaded by assorted specters including a long-clawed demon and a stoop-ball-ready child. Cue the entrance of a pair of ghostbusters (one played by screenwriter Leigh Whannell) straining for comic relief and a goofily prosaic medium (Shaye). If you can smile at these sorts of details, Insidious becomes modestly charming, even scary—perhaps possessed by the ghosts of movies past.

3
Time Out Critic
 
Categories

Dir. James Wan. 2010. PG-13. 102mins. Rose Byrne, Patrick Wilson, Ty Simpkins, Lin Shaye, Barbara Hershey.

Share with your network
Comment