Find an event

The Double at Babes With Blades | Theater review

Barbara Lhota’s backstage comedy shows its work.

By Zac Thompson

Gillian N. Humiston and Brendan Hutt in The Double at Babes With Blades

Photo: Johnny Knight

The latest from Babes With Blades has less fighting than you’d expect, especially from a troupe whose raison d’être is stage combat. Not to mention that the play is a backstage comedy about a troubled production of Cyrano de Bergerac, which should provide ample opportunity for gratuitous swashbuckling. Playwright Barbara Lhota throws in a few desultory, hey-let’s-practice-that-sword-fight scenes, but violence designer Libby Beyreis only gets to choreograph one full-scale knock-down-drag-out: a slapstick battle in which a single actress must play a whole army of Spaniards crossing blades with Cyrano in a performance before Hollywood bigwigs.

The rest of Leigh Barrett’s staging rarely has the same panache. Lhota sets the action in 1940s New York and adopts the style of the period’s screwball comedies. Movie people have descended on Broadway in an effort to give their careers a boost, and during the course of rehearsals, each develops romantic feelings for someone else in the cast. Notably, a stunt double (Gillian N. Humiston) falls for the actress playing Roxanne (Kimberly Logan) and ends up indirectly pitching woo to her à la Cyrano.

This relatively earnest subplot aside, things get very zany very quickly, and instead of making it look easy, Barrett’s cast sweats and strains. The same goes for Lhota, who has dug up a lot of hard-boiled ’40s slang and intends to use every bit of it, no matter how awkward the dialogue gets.

Comments (3)
2
Time Out Critic
Users (6)
Good For

Babes With Blades. By Barbara Lhota. Dir. Leigh Barrett. With Lisa Herceg, Mark Pracht, Gillian N. Humiston, Kimberly Logan. 2hrs; one intermission. 

August 24, 2011
Share with your network
Comment
Comments
I don't think the play is meant to be quite as 'screwball' as you apparently think. I saw the play Sat. night and found it fun, witty and a great take off on a Roziland Russell comedy. Although some of the actors are certain more seasoned than others - the performances overall were solid. How you could possibly find fault in Lisa Hercog's perfect comic timing is beyond me. This is a rather narrow, stilted review of sold writing and some priceless acting. You may need to watch a few 40's comdies - the good ones this time.
By Anonymous (not verified) on 8/22/2011 at 7:41 pm
I disagree about the dialogue. Have you ever seen a movie from this era? As a long time Golden Age afficianado, I thought the quick paced speech and choices of expressions were more than appropriate for the time period. If you've never seen a 40's film, I can imagine you would think it's forced but do a little research and you'll find it was captured accurately. The handling of the era was one of my favorite things from the play.
By Randy (not verified) on 8/23/2011 at 11:07 am
I agree with the previous two comments. You are obviously ill-equipped to be critiquing this genre. Perhaps before delving into your mis-informed opinions you should, in fact, do a little research on the era. This was one of the most fun-filled plays I've seen in years, and Babes With Blades took it on marvelously. Props to the actors for doing their research admirably and performing the witty 40's speak well. And props to the choreographer for taking on all of the violence, (most of which I feel you've missed out on, as there were quite a few instances of violence). All-in-all a great show, and I highly recommend it to anyone looking for a fun night out at the theatre!
By Anonymous (not verified) on 8/23/2011 at 1:45 pm
Have an Opinion? Let's hear it